Field notes Comparisons 9 min
Riga vs Janssens Royal Victorian Greenhouse: Which to Buy
Exaco imports both: a snow-rated polycarbonate arch and a Belgian glass Victorian. Side-by-side on glazing, insulation, price, and who buys which.

The Riga wins on cold-climate insulation and published snow-load ratings; the Royal Victorian wins on light quality, long-term UV permanence, and aesthetics. Both run from roughly $9,000 to $23,000 for comparable footprints, both are Exaco imports from Europe. Choose the Riga for serious winter growing; choose the Royal Victorian for a permanent glass structure in a mild climate where aesthetics and direct sunlight matter more than overnight heat retention.
That summary is accurate, but the comparison is more interesting than the headline suggests. A Riga 5 is $9,199. A Royal Victorian VI 23 is $9,799. Six hundred dollars separates two completely different bets on what a greenhouse is for, sold by the same company through the same distribution chain.
The glazing decision is the whole comparison
Everything downstream in this article follows from one question: glass or polycarbonate?
| Spec | Riga (8mm/10mm twin-wall poly) | Royal Victorian (4mm tempered glass) |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal resistance (R-value) | R-1.6 to R-1.8 (8mm wall panels) | R-1.0 (4mm single pane) |
| Light transmission | 70 to 80%, diffused | Approx. 90%, directional beam |
| Published snow and wind rating | 20+ lb/ft2, 120+ mph (manufacturer figure) | Not published |
| UV permanence | Hazes over 10 to 15 years | No UV degradation |
| Condensation on inner surface | Minimal (air gap insulates) | Significant on cold nights |
Heat retention. The Riga’s 8mm twin-wall polycarbonate delivers roughly 60 to 80 percent better thermal resistance than the Royal Victorian’s 4mm single-pane glass. That gap compounds every cold night. A glass greenhouse on a 10-degree-Fahrenheit night is running a heater materially harder than the equivalent polycarbonate structure. For the largest Royal Victorian (VI 46, 250 square feet), holding 45 degrees inside on a 10-degree night requires approximately 31,000 BTU/hr, the kind of load that justifies a dedicated greenhouse unit like the Bio Green Palma greenhouse heater. The same math in twin-wall polycarbonate drops the heater requirement by roughly 40 percent at the same footprint. The cheap greenhouse heating guide has the full heating math by glazing type, kit size, and climate zone.
Light quality. 4mm tempered glass transmits roughly 90 percent of available sunlight with directional beam light intact. Standard twin-wall polycarbonate transmits 70 to 80 percent and diffuses it. For orchids, citrus, cacti, or any crop that wants concentrated direct sun, glass is the superior growing environment. For most vegetables, herbs, and seedlings started in spring, diffused polycarbonate light does the job equally well.
UV permanence. Polycarbonate panels yellow and haze over roughly 10 to 15 years of UV exposure. Standard Exaco Riga polycarbonate is warranted for 10 years. Tempered glass does not degrade under UV. A Royal Victorian built correctly on a proper foundation should look as sharp in 2056 as it does at install. Over a 30-year timeline, the glass greenhouse avoids a panel replacement cycle; the polycarbonate greenhouse does not.
Published structural ratings. The Riga carries manufacturer figures of 120-plus mph wind and a 20-plus pound snow load; the Riga XL is rated to 30 pounds (Exaco, “Best Greenhouse for Snow and Wind,” verified June 2026). Exaco does not publish structural ratings for the Royal Victorian. That asymmetry matters in snow country or high-wind exposure zones, where being able to verify a kit against a county-level ground snow load is part of the buying decision. The snow and wind load guide explains how to read county ground snow maps and what the translation to roof snow load means in practice.

The frame and roofline
The Riga uses 13-gauge aluminum for its curved onion-arch, which is heavier than the 17-gauge aluminum in the Royal Victorian’s gabled frame. Gauge difference doesn’t automatically make one structure stronger at every point. The Royal Victorian’s gabled geometry and glass walls that lock into the ridge bar add structural stiffness. But the Riga’s arch handles snow distribution in a mechanically specific way.
A curved surface under snow load is different from a peaked or flat one. Snow that slides off the Riga’s arch does not pile. Snow that accumulates on a flat or shallow-pitched roof can reach the point where it doesn’t. The Riga was designed in Germany specifically for this failure mode. Its snow-load figures reflect that engineering intention, even if the manufacturer figures are not state-certified engineering stamps. (Exaco is explicit on this: they provide general structural certifications but not the engineer-stamped, state-specific letter some building departments require. Factor that in for permit purposes.)
The Royal Victorian’s gabled roofline is steeper than many comparably priced polycarbonate kits, which helps snow slide, but the glass panels depend on the gable geometry more than the arch depends on the Riga’s curve. Glass cannot flex; polycarbonate panels can. In a surprise snow event, that material difference matters.
Price: what the overlapping tiers actually look like
Both lines run from roughly $8,800 to $23,000 for the main configurations. The price overlap is real and the comparison is not a budget-versus-premium mismatch.
| Riga | Royal Victorian | |
|---|---|---|
| Entry | Riga 2s: ~$5,095, 54 sq ft | Junior Victorian JV 23: $8,799, 79 sq ft |
| Mid-size crossover | Riga 5: $9,199, 165 sq ft | Royal Victorian VI 23: $9,799, 79 sq ft |
| Mid-range | Riga XL 5: $17,250, 231 sq ft | Royal Victorian VI 36: $14,499, 200 sq ft |
| Large | Riga XL 9: $22,999, 413 sq ft | Royal Victorian VI 46: $18,999, 250 sq ft |
The floor area comparison tells the clearest story. At $9,000 to $10,000, the Riga 5 gives 165 square feet in polycarbonate. The Junior Victorian JV 23 gives 79 square feet in glass at $8,799. The Riga 5 is more than twice the growing space at a similar price. The Royal Victorian is glass at roughly equivalent cost for substantially less floor. If growing area per dollar is the metric, the Riga wins at every comparison point. If glass is the material requirement, the Royal Victorian is the only path.
There is no hybrid value proposition in this comparison. You are not buying more of the same thing for less money; you are buying a different thing. The prices give you a sense of what each commitment costs, not a way to get both.

Assembly, installation, and foundation
Both kits are two-person, multi-day projects and both demand a level, square foundation before the first frame piece goes up.
The Riga’s complexity is assembly sequence and instruction quality. Exaco’s 3D animation video does the teaching the paper manual doesn’t. Experienced Riga owners consistently report a two-day build with two people, and the sequence-dependency means a missed step early requires disassembly back to it. The foundation requirement is strict but forgiving in material: treated lumber, pavers, a shallow C-frame in a trench, or a concrete perimeter all work. The greenhouse foundation guide covers the options by soil type and footprint size.
The Royal Victorian’s complexity is material handling. 4mm tempered glass is strong within design parameters and unforgiving outside them. Owners consistently report two to three days for two people on the smaller models, with professional installation standard on the larger configurations. The foundation requirement is less forgiving in material: glass seated on an uneven base cannot be adjusted the way polycarbonate panels can. Concrete perimeter footing or full slab is the standard approach. In frost-heave zones, footings below the frost line are the correct solution.
Condensation management is the ongoing operational distinction. On cold nights, the interior face of a glass wall will be significantly colder than the greenhouse air, and humidity condenses on it and drips onto benches and crops below. A working Royal Victorian layout accounts for this with bench placement and drainage. Twin-wall polycarbonate nearly eliminates condensation on the interior surface because the air gap between layers insulates it toward room temperature.
Climate verdict by zone
Zone 4 and colder: The Riga. Published snow-load ratings, arch geometry that sheds rather than accumulates, and R-1.6 to R-1.8 polycarbonate that holds overnight warmth materially better than R-1.0 glass. The Royal Victorian in a zone-4 winter requires a correctly sized heater running hard every cold night to protect plants, paired with a controller like the Inkbird ITC-308 temperature controller so it holds the setpoint without overshooting.
Zone 5 and 6, mixed: The swing vote. If the priority is season-extension growing, the Riga handles it more efficiently. If the priority is a permanent glass structure that serves as an architectural feature and a growing space, the Royal Victorian makes sense with a properly sized heater. Zone 5 and 6 buyers who lean toward the Royal Victorian should look seriously at the Hybrid model (glass walls, 10mm polycarbonate roof), which costs $3,500 to $5,000 more per model than the all-glass version but addresses overnight heat loss where it is most pronounced: warm air exits through the apex, and polycarbonate on the roof reduces that drain.
Zone 7 and warmer: The Royal Victorian becomes genuinely viable. Single-pane glass in a mild climate loses less heating energy to cold nights because the cold is less extreme. The aesthetics and light-quality advantages get to matter more when insulation is not the survival question.

What each kit is actually for
The Riga is a working greenhouse. Buy it because you need to grow year-round in a real winter, and the frame that lets you do that is heavier, more snow-rated, and retains heat better than a glass conservatory. You get less aesthetics and more growing seasons.
The Royal Victorian is an architectural greenhouse. Buy it because you want glass, because you want a permanent structure that looks as sharp in 30 years as it does today without a panel-replacement cycle, and because you want the light quality and visual presence of a glass conservatory in a garden that can absorb the heating bill. You get more aesthetics and a longer-lived glazing material.
Both are reviewed in full detail with complete model lineups, pricing tables, and owner-synthesis findings: the Exaco Riga review and the Janssens Royal Victorian review. For a third premium-tier option with published 25 lb/ft2 snow and 76 mph wind ratings, the Grandio Elite review covers the direct-sale American competitor in the same price range. For the full polycarbonate glazing decision, the greenhouse plastic guide covers 4mm through 16mm panels with R-values and light transmission numbers drawn from manufacturer spec sheets.
Accessories worth buying on day one
Either of these is a serious structure; the same short list of controls and shelving makes both easier to run.
- AcuRite indoor/outdoor digital thermometer: a remote probe shows the real overnight low inside, which matters most in the glass Victorian where heat leaves faster.
- Bayliss MK7 automatic vent opener: a wax-cylinder opener vents the roof on a sunny day with no power, a useful backup for either roofline.
- 4-tier greenhouse staging shelves: tiered benching organizes pots and trays and puts the floor space of a premium kit to fuller use.
As an Amazon Associate, Defy Frost earns from qualifying purchases.